My thriller Upload: A Very American Conspiracy is now available on Smashwords at http://smashwords.com/b/313978. Within days of this post it will also become downloadable from Apple iBookstore, Barnes & Noble, Sony Reader Store, Kobo, the Diesel eBook Store, Baker & Taylor's Blio and Axis360. A page-turning 100,000 words for a meagre $2.99! A thriller and a textbook of conspiracy investigation in one volume. Buy it now before they sell out... (I'll provide more links as they become available.)
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Monday, 5 November 2012
Thoughts on the JFK assassination (2) and Batman/Colorado (1)
Shortly after posting my first thoughts on this subject I came across this post at the Above Top Secret blog: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread864644/pg1. It was the title that caught my attention: "10 key points of evidence that point to a conspiracy in the Batman/Colorado shooting".
Most of the "points" aren't evidence at all and the ones that are, don't point to any kind of conspiracy. Saying that witnesses didn't agree with each other or with the police, is something that can be said of most criminal incidents. It's something that annoys investigators and fascinates psychologists: eye-witnesses are not reliable.
Saying there's no papertrail for the perpetrator's purchase of the weapons used presumes that the police has no papertrail. More likely, there is a documentary trail of the purchase, but the police haven't shared it with the media (or this blogger) yet. And why should they? It will be used in court.
In another instance, the blogger finds it sinister that one of the witnesses gave an accurate description of the alleged gunman. After the shooting, she was found face-down on the floor -- so how could she have seen him? Well, how about she saw his face, saw his gun -- and ducked?! Later posts deal with all 10 points without straining too many brain-cells.
It's a classic case of wanting a conspiracy and then desperately trying to find something to support the idea.
Most of the "points" aren't evidence at all and the ones that are, don't point to any kind of conspiracy. Saying that witnesses didn't agree with each other or with the police, is something that can be said of most criminal incidents. It's something that annoys investigators and fascinates psychologists: eye-witnesses are not reliable.
Saying there's no papertrail for the perpetrator's purchase of the weapons used presumes that the police has no papertrail. More likely, there is a documentary trail of the purchase, but the police haven't shared it with the media (or this blogger) yet. And why should they? It will be used in court.
In another instance, the blogger finds it sinister that one of the witnesses gave an accurate description of the alleged gunman. After the shooting, she was found face-down on the floor -- so how could she have seen him? Well, how about she saw his face, saw his gun -- and ducked?! Later posts deal with all 10 points without straining too many brain-cells.
It's a classic case of wanting a conspiracy and then desperately trying to find something to support the idea.
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Thoughts on the JFK assassination (1)
November 22nd, 1963. I
can remember quite clearly where I was when news of the murder of President
Kennedy reached Britain. I was in a
small print-shop in South London proof-reading a galley hot off the wonderful
Lino-type machine. Through the clanking
of the Heidelberg press, the stitcher and the guillotine I could just about
hear the radio.
My attention was drawn to the fact that the BBC suddenly
stopped the music and a sonorous voice said: “We interrupt this programme…” Then something about a shooting in Dallas,
Texas and, “President Kennedy is dead.”
It was late-enough in the day for the killing of police officer J D
Tippit to be reported. And the fact that
a man had been arrested.
After all this time I don’t recall how long it was before the
conspiracy theories started; without the web, there had to be a time-lag! Within a week of the assassination opinion
polls reported that some 52% of Americans believed Lee Harvey Oswald did not
act alone.
Less than a year later, in September 1964, 55.5% agreed with
the findings of the Warren Commission that he did act alone. But that left over 30% firmly sticking to the
conspiracy theory. And I agreed with
them.
I devoured Mark Lane’s 1966 book Rush to Judgement and engrossed myself in Oswald’s biography, the
mystery of the Magic Bullet and the shooter on the grassy knoll. But by the time I watched Oliver Stone’s JFK I found it difficult not to laugh
out loud. Even the talents of such a fine
film-maker could not disguise the fact that the conspiracy theory was all
bollocks.
So, what went wrong?
Well, there wasn’t a blinding flash in the night. I wasn’t handed a suitcase stuffed full of
$100 bills in a deserted parking structure.
(I wish!) It was more a gradual
process. I stopped trying to use what
was known about the assassination before, during and after the events in Dealey
Plaza on November 22nd, 1993 to prove a pre-existing theory. Instead, I took each piece of evidence in
turn and examined it – as far as I could – down to a molecular level.
A few years ago, a close friend and colleague, said to me, “What
about the Magic Bullet, then?” Well,
what about it? The Magic Bullet – or Single
Bullet – theory proposes that a bullet passing through the President’s neck
from behind and angled from right to left could not possibly have been the same
bullet that struck Governor Connally in the right shoulder. Unless
it magically changed direction in its flight between the two men.
Of course, even if the bullet had been made by Harry Potter, that in itself does not prove that
President Kennedy was assassinated by the Mafia. Or the Cubans. Or whoever.
The answer turns out to be simple. Most people think of a sedan travelling down
a city street, two people in the front, two in the back, more-or-less at the
same height. But that wasn’t the case
with the presidential limousine. There
were six people on board. Up front were
two Secret Service agents. In the back
were the President and Mrs Kennedy.
Between them, Governor and Mrs Connally were sitting on what are called “jump
seats”. Consequently, the governor was
not in line and at the same height as the president; Connally was sitting lower
and more inboard and when those adjustments are made, the path of the “Magic”
bullet turns out to be dead straight and true.
This web page
does a pretty thorough job of laying out the evidence. But, given that it’s relatively easy to
discount this theory, one has to ask why it ever became a “theory” in the first
place. Essentially, it shows the danger
of starting out with a mind-set and then going out to dig up all the anomalies –
or apparent anomalies – that might go
some way towards proving it.
This is the difference between faith-based journalism and fact-based journalism. More on this in subsequent posts.Wednesday, 24 October 2012
UPLOAD: A VERY AMERICAN CONSPIRACY
UPLOAD AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD ON AMAZON
October 22nd, 2012. My conspiracy thriller Upload: A Very American Conspiracy is now available for download at Amazon. This is a fast-moving read that
starts with a misunderstanding near Montgomery, Alabama and ends with a bloody
shoot-out in Alexandria, Virginia. The background to the story is the brutal
assassination of Dr Martin Luther King Jr on April 4th, 1968, at the
Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee on April 4, 1968. He was 39 years old.
Please review at Amazon or post comments here!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)